A prominent Black historian faces significant professional consequences after her acclaimed slavery study was found to contain substantial factual errors by academic reviewers. Following the discovery of these inaccuracies, she relinquished her tenured position. In response, she has characterized scholarly criticism of her work as racially motivated, raising complex questions about academic accountability, peer review integrity, and the intersection of identity politics within historical scholarship and institutional academia.

Summary auto-generated by AI from the original publisher's content. Editorial standards.