International humanitarian law establishes strict protocols distinguishing civilian infrastructure from legitimate military targets. This analysis examines how major powers, including the United States and Iran, have navigated these legal boundaries during conflicts. Understanding the classification of civilian sites—hospitals, schools, residential areas—is essential for assessing compliance with Geneva Conventions and evaluating potential war crimes. The article explores documented incidents, legal interpretations, and the controversy surrounding proportionality assessments in modern warfare.

Summary auto-generated by AI from the original publisher's content. Editorial standards.